What is better, to change the timing belt around 100,000? or how high? or to let it break on its own.
What, if any, collateral damage incurs by simply leaving it be until it breaks on its own?
2. If the water pump isn't exchanged at this time, will it strip the belt once it also breaks down?2-in-1 q. What's the difference in damage if one lets a timing belt live its life out until breakage?you need really change the timing belt at around 60.000 miles if you let it break then it will cause all sorts of big problems like bent valves broken pistons and so on as for the water pump no it will not strip the belt2-in-1 q. What's the difference in damage if one lets a timing belt live its life out until breakage?In all seriousness, that's like asking why we shouldn't wait until the vehicle runs completely out of gas instead of when the indicator shows close to empty - or why we should replace the tires when the wear bar indicators are exposed instead of driving them for all their worth.
The answer is simple - no one wants to break down on the freeway during rush hour or walk home during a snow storm.
No comments:
Post a Comment